9 Comments

Though I do not know if I come down on the same side as you on this issue, I greatly appreciate that you're beginning the conversation thoughtfully. This is where we need to be having one of the few deep conversations in order to know how to move forward.

I have been writing less myself because I constantly bump up against the question of "Who/what are we facing off against?", "How is the war taking place, fundamentally?", and "Do we make improvements by playing their game, or improving our game in defending status quo systems?"

Not easy questions to answer, but crucially important.

Expand full comment

"digitized anarcho-feudalism" brilliant phrase, brilliant article, Gabriel. I don't know anyone else seeing this as clearly and explaining it as succinctly as you do.

Expand full comment
author

Thanks a ton! I hope you've been doing well!

Expand full comment
Mar 15Liked by Gabriel

So Punk Rock! Love it. Life was so much better back in the analogue days of my youth! Fight the power! Fight the powers that be!

Expand full comment

The temptation is for easy, or as Jello Biafra so famously titled the Dead Kennedys double live album, "Give me convenience or give me death".

It is hard to say "Fuck, no"! ... the 1st few times 🤔 but it becomes reflexive 😘 I just went into Taree (NSW, Australia) Centrelink/Gov Services to formally fill in a form to WITHDRAW, DENY, REFUSE an Australian Federal Government Digital I.D. They can insert it where their colostomy bag goes. I read the fine print; if say the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) sends one an email, via Digital Enslavement Convenience, and you do not answer it? You'll have a FINE old time 🤑🤑🤑. The CNTS can write me a letter.... I ain't giving my traitor Gov't permission to use an IOTA of MY DATA.

I am not your data bitch.

I am not your data, bitch.

I am. Not yours. My data. Bitch.

Expand full comment

What are your thoughts Gabriel about using Smart Contracts specifically and exclusively for ELECTIONS?

Wouldn't that be a better set up than the current one?

If not, can you think of another set up that is superior in protecting both the INTEGRITY and TRANSPARENCY of the electoral process?

Expand full comment
author
Aug 29·edited Aug 29Author

I'm dangerously close to "transistors shouldn't be involved with elections".

But if they are done digitally, I don't think there's anything wrong with recording election RESULTS, so long as identities can't be traced back to votes (which is crucial imo).

To be fair, I haven't given too much thought to elections specifically.

Edit: inb4 voting is bad/evil anyways

Expand full comment

"so long as identities can't be traced back to votes"

This is fairly easy to achieve from a technical standpoint using techniques such as hashing or single use public key/wallet address.

I have been toying with this idea together with a few other people whereby a vote is issued in the form of an NFT and there are two smart contracts:

1. VOTING smart contract which distributes the vote (NFT) as per the voter's wishes; and

2. COUNTING smart contract which does exactly what it says on the tin with the last step being recording the results as an immutable record on-chain and making it read only for all eternity.

We were thinking of using Solana for that given how cheap it is to issue NFTs at scale and the very low transaction cost but I am not married to any particular DLT.

The voting itself will be facilitated through a simple voting device (essentially a raspberry pi with a touchscreen) which will also act as the hardware wallet to store the vote (NFT).

Expand full comment

Ethical Web Principles, as revised by Yet Another Tommy

should supersede the W3C version...

https://tomg2021.substack.com/p/ethical-web-principles-as-revised

Expand full comment